Centennial Conference

Team Statistics


Overall Statistics


Centennial Conference Overall Statistics (as of May 23, 2005) (All games Sorted by Batting avg) Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD% Washington.. .327 31 1035 244 338 63 11 10 205 453 .438 115 28 155 22 .403 15 21 43-56 738 288 65 .940 Haverford... .323 40 1392 345 450 92 23 33 320 687 .494 160 59 209 1 .409 24 9 123-143 996 432 76 .949 JHU......... .318 41 1465 382 466 114 4 70 339 798 .545 159 44 220 29 .395 26 12 114-124 1067 448 59 .963 Muhlenberg.. .301 32 1144 275 344 65 24 13 234 496 .434 164 29 172 2 .397 14 7 35-46 811 315 77 .936 Gettysburg.. .284 39 1224 202 348 60 17 5 171 457 .373 120 29 188 23 .359 12 12 37-48 895 380 76 .944 F&M......... .281 41 1286 221 362 61 8 11 191 472 .367 153 22 178 17 .364 16 12 87-104 994 397 65 .955 McDaniel.... .278 26 867 136 241 52 13 9 122 346 .399 92 24 163 6 .360 9 7 17-18 624 261 52 .945 Dickinson... .277 35 1114 190 309 71 17 11 167 447 .401 88 35 201 2 .345 15 7 37-63 815 352 96 .924 Ursinus..... .274 36 1134 167 311 43 13 5 148 395 .348 106 35 191 8 .352 10 26 41-53 846 368 74 .943 Swarthmore.. .242 28 856 108 207 36 6 3 88 264 .308 102 22 181 12 .335 7 6 19-26 652 301 96 .908 (All games Sorted by Earned run avg) Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA F&M......... 3.48 25-16 41 10 3/0 5 331.1 340 183 128 115 271 57 10 14 1311 .259 28 43 5 6 24 JHU......... 4.00 32-9 41 10 2/2 7 355.2 353 192 158 108 270 64 15 20 1380 .256 30 34 1 10 13 Gettysburg.. 4.13 20-19 39 18 2/0 2 298.1 324 192 137 110 198 66 11 18 1190 .272 19 31 7 12 13 Haverford... 4.31 25-15 40 5 1/0 6 332.0 360 234 159 159 243 57 8 40 1321 .273 25 27 1 14 11 Washington.. 5.27 17-14 31 2 1/0 4 246.0 282 217 144 136 127 63 6 18 1012 .279 10 31 3 12 11 Swarthmore.. 6.29 5-23 28 13 1/0 0 217.1 283 230 152 90 137 58 11 5 940 .301 33 20 0 12 10 McDaniel.... 6.62 7-19 26 5 0/0 2 208.0 269 202 153 113 128 55 13 15 872 .308 21 31 3 12 10 Dickinson... 6.82 10-24 35 9 0/0 4 272.0 390 287 206 152 172 74 13 21 1174 .332 31 34 5 14 14 Muhlenberg.. 7.09 17-15 32 4 0/0 4 270.1 361 261 213 126 192 68 20 13 1133 .319 37 43 8 21 15 Ursinus..... 7.28 12-23 36 10 0/0 2 282.0 367 276 228 174 179 88 12 17 1176 .312 32 18 9 14 16 (All games Sorted by Fielding pct) Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI JHU......... 1574 1067 448 59 .963 33 54 10 .844 19 0 F&M......... 1456 994 397 65 .955 30 35 7 .833 10 1 Haverford... 1504 996 432 76 .949 28 44 14 .759 5 0 McDaniel.... 937 624 261 52 .945 20 61 6 .910 13 0 Gettysburg.. 1351 895 380 76 .944 28 42 14 .750 15 1 Ursinus..... 1288 846 368 74 .943 33 64 9 .877 8 0 Washington.. 1091 738 288 65 .940 13 56 6 .903 16 0 Muhlenberg.. 1203 811 315 77 .936 29 48 11 .814 9 0 Dickinson... 1263 815 352 96 .924 34 54 13 .806 16 2 Swarthmore.. 1049 652 301 96 .908 18 78 13 .857 15 1

Category Leaders


Centennial Conference Batting Leaders (as of May 23, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 67% of Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game Batting avg ----------- 1. Washington.. .327 2. Haverford... .323 3. JHU......... .318 4. Muhlenberg.. .301 5. Gettysburg.. .284 6. F&M......... .281 7. McDaniel.... .278 8. Dickinson... .277 9. Ursinus..... .274 10.Swarthmore.. .242 Slugging pct ------------ 1. JHU......... .545 2. Haverford... .494 3. Washington.. .438 4. Muhlenberg.. .434 5. Dickinson... .401 6. McDaniel.... .399 7. Gettysburg.. .373 8. F&M......... .367 9. Ursinus..... .348 10.Swarthmore.. .308 On base pct ----------- 1. Haverford... .409 2. Washington.. .403 3. Muhlenberg.. .397 4. JHU......... .395 5. F&M......... .364 6. McDaniel.... .360 7. Gettysburg.. .359 8. Ursinus..... .352 9. Dickinson... .345 10.Swarthmore.. .335 Runs scored ----------- 1. JHU......... 382 2. Haverford... 345 3. Muhlenberg.. 275 4. Washington.. 244 5. F&M......... 221 6. Gettysburg.. 202 7. Dickinson... 190 8. Ursinus..... 167 9. McDaniel.... 136 10.Swarthmore.. 108 Hits ---- 1. JHU......... 466 2. Haverford... 450 3. F&M......... 362 4. Gettysburg.. 348 5. Muhlenberg.. 344 6. Washington.. 338 7. Ursinus..... 311 8. Dickinson... 309 9. McDaniel.... 241 10.Swarthmore.. 207 Runs batted in -------------- 1. JHU......... 339 2. Haverford... 320 3. Muhlenberg.. 234 4. Washington.. 205 5. F&M......... 191 6. Gettysburg.. 171 7. Dickinson... 167 8. Ursinus..... 148 9. McDaniel.... 122 10.Swarthmore.. 88 Doubles ------- 1. JHU......... 114 2. Haverford... 92 3. Dickinson... 71 4. Muhlenberg.. 65 5. Washington.. 63 6. F&M......... 61 7. Gettysburg.. 60 8. McDaniel.... 52 9. Ursinus..... 43 10.Swarthmore.. 36 Triples ------- 1. Muhlenberg.. 24 2. Haverford... 23 3. Dickinson... 17 Gettysburg.. 17 5. McDaniel.... 13 Ursinus..... 13 7. Washington.. 11 8. F&M......... 8 9. Swarthmore.. 6 10.JHU......... 4 Home runs --------- 1. JHU......... 70 2. Haverford... 33 3. Muhlenberg.. 13 4. Dickinson... 11 F&M......... 11 6. Washington.. 10 7. McDaniel.... 9 8. Ursinus..... 5 Gettysburg.. 5 10.Swarthmore.. 3 Total bases ----------- 1. JHU......... 798 2. Haverford... 687 3. Muhlenberg.. 496 4. F&M......... 472 5. Gettysburg.. 457 6. Washington.. 453 7. Dickinson... 447 8. Ursinus..... 395 9. McDaniel.... 346 10.Swarthmore.. 264 Total plate appearances ----------------------- 1. JHU......... 1706 2. Haverford... 1644 3. F&M......... 1491 4. Gettysburg.. 1398 5. Muhlenberg.. 1358 6. Ursinus..... 1311 7. Dickinson... 1261 8. Washington.. 1215 9. McDaniel.... 999 10.Swarthmore.. 993 At bats ------- 1. JHU......... 1465 2. Haverford... 1392 3. F&M......... 1286 4. Gettysburg.. 1224 5. Muhlenberg.. 1144 6. Ursinus..... 1134 7. Dickinson... 1114 8. Washington.. 1035 9. McDaniel.... 867 10.Swarthmore.. 856 Walks ----- 1. Muhlenberg.. 164 2. Haverford... 160 3. JHU......... 159 4. F&M......... 153 5. Gettysburg.. 120 6. Washington.. 115 7. Ursinus..... 106 8. Swarthmore.. 102 9. McDaniel.... 92 10.Dickinson... 88 Hit by pitch ------------ 1. Haverford... 59 2. JHU......... 44 3. Ursinus..... 35 Dickinson... 35 5. Gettysburg.. 29 Muhlenberg.. 29 7. Washington.. 28 8. McDaniel.... 24 9. Swarthmore.. 22 F&M......... 22 Strikeouts ---------- 1. JHU......... 220 2. Haverford... 209 3. Dickinson... 201 4. Ursinus..... 191 5. Gettysburg.. 188 6. Swarthmore.. 181 7. F&M......... 178 8. Muhlenberg.. 172 9. McDaniel.... 163 10.Washington.. 155 Sac bunts --------- 1. Ursinus..... 26 2. Washington.. 21 3. Gettysburg.. 12 F&M......... 12 JHU......... 12 6. Haverford... 9 7. Muhlenberg.. 7 McDaniel.... 7 Dickinson... 7 10.Swarthmore.. 6 Sac flies --------- 1. JHU......... 26 2. Haverford... 24 3. F&M......... 16 4. Washington.. 15 Dickinson... 15 6. Muhlenberg.. 14 7. Gettysburg.. 12 8. Ursinus..... 10 9. McDaniel.... 9 10.Swarthmore.. 7 Stolen bases ------------ 1. Haverford... 123 2. JHU......... 114 3. F&M......... 87 4. Washington.. 43 5. Ursinus..... 41 6. Gettysburg.. 37 Dickinson... 37 8. Muhlenberg.. 35 9. Swarthmore.. 19 10.McDaniel.... 17 Caught stealing --------------- 1. Dickinson... 26 2. Haverford... 20 3. F&M......... 17 4. Washington.. 13 5. Ursinus..... 12 6. Muhlenberg.. 11 Gettysburg.. 11 8. JHU......... 10 9. Swarthmore.. 7 10.McDaniel.... 1 Steal attempts -------------- 1. Haverford... 143 2. JHU......... 124 3. F&M......... 104 4. Dickinson... 63 5. Washington.. 56 6. Ursinus..... 53 7. Gettysburg.. 48 8. Muhlenberg.. 46 9. Swarthmore.. 26 10.McDaniel.... 18 Grounded into DP ---------------- 1. JHU......... 29 2. Gettysburg.. 23 3. Washington.. 22 4. F&M......... 17 5. Swarthmore.. 12 6. Ursinus..... 8 7. McDaniel.... 6 8. Dickinson... 2 Muhlenberg.. 2 10.Haverford... 1
Centennial Conference Pitching Leaders (as of May 23, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 67% of Games 2.0 AB/Game Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game Earned run avg -------------- 1. F&M......... 3.48 2. JHU......... 4.00 3. Gettysburg.. 4.13 4. Haverford... 4.31 5. Washington.. 5.27 6. Swarthmore.. 6.29 7. McDaniel.... 6.62 8. Dickinson... 6.82 9. Muhlenberg.. 7.09 10.Ursinus..... 7.28 Opposing bat avg ---------------- 1. JHU......... .256 2. F&M......... .259 3. Gettysburg.. .272 4. Haverford... .273 5. Washington.. .279 6. Swarthmore.. .301 7. McDaniel.... .308 8. Ursinus..... .312 9. Muhlenberg.. .319 10.Dickinson... .332 Innings pitched --------------- 1. JHU......... 355.2 2. Haverford... 332.0 3. F&M......... 331.1 4. Gettysburg.. 298.1 5. Ursinus..... 282.0 6. Dickinson... 272.0 7. Muhlenberg.. 270.1 8. Washington.. 246.0 9. Swarthmore.. 217.1 10.McDaniel.... 208.0 Batters struck out ------------------ 1. F&M......... 271 2. JHU......... 270 3. Haverford... 243 4. Gettysburg.. 198 5. Muhlenberg.. 192 6. Ursinus..... 179 7. Dickinson... 172 8. Swarthmore.. 137 9. McDaniel.... 128 10.Washington.. 127 Batters SO out looking ---------------------- 1. Gettysburg.. 83 2. F&M......... 81 3. Haverford... 79 4. JHU......... 76 5. Muhlenberg.. 65 6. Ursinus..... 62 7. McDaniel.... 58 8. Dickinson... 50 9. Washington.. 38 10.Swarthmore.. 35 Wins ---- 1. JHU......... 32 2. Haverford... 25 F&M......... 25 4. Gettysburg.. 20 5. Washington.. 17 Muhlenberg.. 17 7. Ursinus..... 12 8. Dickinson... 10 9. McDaniel.... 7 10.Swarthmore.. 5 Losses ------ 1. Dickinson... 24 2. Ursinus..... 23 Swarthmore.. 23 4. McDaniel.... 19 Gettysburg.. 19 6. F&M......... 16 7. Haverford... 15 Muhlenberg.. 15 9. Washington.. 14 10.JHU......... 9 Saves ----- 1. JHU......... 7 2. Haverford... 6 3. F&M......... 5 4. Muhlenberg.. 4 Washington.. 4 Dickinson... 4 7. Ursinus..... 2 Gettysburg.. 2 McDaniel.... 2 Runners picked off ------------------ 1. Haverford... 16 2. Gettysburg.. 12 3. Dickinson... 11 4. JHU......... 6 5. Washington.. 5 Muhlenberg.. 5 Ursinus..... 5 F&M......... 5 9. Swarthmore.. 4 10.McDaniel.... 2 Sac bunts allowed ----------------- 1. F&M......... 24 2. Ursinus..... 16 3. Muhlenberg.. 15 4. Dickinson... 14 5. Gettysburg.. 13 JHU......... 13 7. Washington.. 11 Haverford... 11 9. Swarthmore.. 10 McDaniel.... 10 Sac flies allowed ----------------- 1. Muhlenberg.. 21 2. Ursinus..... 14 Haverford... 14 Dickinson... 14 5. Gettysburg.. 12 Washington.. 12 McDaniel.... 12 Swarthmore.. 12 9. JHU......... 10 10.F&M......... 6 Hits allowed ------------ 1. McDaniel.... 269 2. Washington.. 282 3. Swarthmore.. 283 4. Gettysburg.. 324 5. F&M......... 340 6. JHU......... 353 7. Haverford... 360 8. Muhlenberg.. 361 9. Ursinus..... 367 10.Dickinson... 390 Runs allowed ------------ 1. F&M......... 183 2. Gettysburg.. 192 JHU......... 192 4. McDaniel.... 202 5. Washington.. 217 6. Swarthmore.. 230 7. Haverford... 234 8. Muhlenberg.. 261 9. Ursinus..... 276 10.Dickinson... 287 Earned runs allowed ------------------- 1. F&M......... 128 2. Gettysburg.. 137 3. Washington.. 144 4. Swarthmore.. 152 5. McDaniel.... 153 6. JHU......... 158 7. Haverford... 159 8. Dickinson... 206 9. Muhlenberg.. 213 10.Ursinus..... 228 Walks allowed ------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 90 2. JHU......... 108 3. Gettysburg.. 110 4. McDaniel.... 113 5. F&M......... 115 6. Muhlenberg.. 126 7. Washington.. 136 8. Dickinson... 152 9. Haverford... 159 10.Ursinus..... 174 Doubles allowed --------------- 1. McDaniel.... 55 2. F&M......... 57 Haverford... 57 4. Swarthmore.. 58 5. Washington.. 63 6. JHU......... 64 7. Gettysburg.. 66 8. Muhlenberg.. 68 9. Dickinson... 74 10.Ursinus..... 88 Triples allowed --------------- 1. Washington.. 6 2. Haverford... 8 3. F&M......... 10 4. Gettysburg.. 11 Swarthmore.. 11 6. Ursinus..... 12 7. Dickinson... 13 McDaniel.... 13 9. JHU......... 15 10.Muhlenberg.. 20 Home runs allowed ----------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 5 2. Muhlenberg.. 13 3. F&M......... 14 4. McDaniel.... 15 5. Ursinus..... 17 6. Gettysburg.. 18 Washington.. 18 8. JHU......... 20 9. Dickinson... 21 10.Haverford... 40 Wild pitches ------------ 1. Muhlenberg.. 37 2. Swarthmore.. 33 3. Ursinus..... 32 4. Dickinson... 31 5. JHU......... 30 6. F&M......... 28 7. Haverford... 25 8. McDaniel.... 21 9. Gettysburg.. 19 10.Washington.. 10 Balks ----- 1. Ursinus..... 9 2. Muhlenberg.. 8 3. Gettysburg.. 7 4. Dickinson... 5 F&M......... 5 6. Washington.. 3 McDaniel.... 3 8. JHU......... 1 Haverford... 1 Hit batters ----------- 1. Muhlenberg.. 43 F&M......... 43 3. Dickinson... 34 JHU......... 34 5. Gettysburg.. 31 Washington.. 31 McDaniel.... 31 8. Haverford... 27 9. Swarthmore.. 20 10.Ursinus..... 18 Intentional BB allowed ---------------------- 1. Haverford... 6 2. Muhlenberg.. 3 McDaniel.... 3 4. Gettysburg.. 2 Dickinson... 2 Washington.. 2 7. JHU......... 1 Ursinus..... 1 Centennial Conference Fielding Leaders (as of May 23, 2005) (All games) Hitting minimums - 67% of Games Pitching minimums - 1.0 IP/Game Fielding pct ------------ 1. JHU......... .963 2. F&M......... .955 3. Haverford... .949 4. McDaniel.... .945 5. Gettysburg.. .944 6. Ursinus..... .943 7. Washington.. .940 8. Muhlenberg.. .936 9. Dickinson... .924 10.Swarthmore.. .908 Chances ------- 1. JHU......... 1574 2. Haverford... 1504 3. F&M......... 1456 4. Gettysburg.. 1351 5. Ursinus..... 1288 6. Dickinson... 1263 7. Muhlenberg.. 1203 8. Washington.. 1091 9. Swarthmore.. 1049 10.McDaniel.... 937 Putouts ------- 1. JHU......... 1067 2. Haverford... 996 3. F&M......... 994 4. Gettysburg.. 895 5. Ursinus..... 846 6. Dickinson... 815 7. Muhlenberg.. 811 8. Washington.. 738 9. Swarthmore.. 652 10.McDaniel.... 624 Assists ------- 1. JHU......... 448 2. Haverford... 432 3. F&M......... 397 4. Gettysburg.. 380 5. Ursinus..... 368 6. Dickinson... 352 7. Muhlenberg.. 315 8. Swarthmore.. 301 9. Washington.. 288 10.McDaniel.... 261 Errors ------ 1. Dickinson... 96 Swarthmore.. 96 3. Muhlenberg.. 77 4. Haverford... 76 Gettysburg.. 76 6. Ursinus..... 74 7. F&M......... 65 Washington.. 65 9. JHU......... 59 10.McDaniel.... 52 Fielding double plays --------------------- 1. Dickinson... 34 2. JHU......... 33 Ursinus..... 33 4. F&M......... 30 5. Muhlenberg.. 29 6. Gettysburg.. 28 Haverford... 28 8. McDaniel.... 20 9. Swarthmore.. 18 10.Washington.. 13 Stolen bases against -------------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 78 2. Ursinus..... 64 3. McDaniel.... 61 4. Washington.. 56 5. JHU......... 54 Dickinson... 54 7. Muhlenberg.. 48 8. Haverford... 44 9. Gettysburg.. 42 10.F&M......... 35 Caught stealing by ------------------ 1. Gettysburg.. 14 Haverford... 14 3. Dickinson... 13 Swarthmore.. 13 5. Muhlenberg.. 11 6. JHU......... 10 7. Ursinus..... 9 8. F&M......... 7 9. Washington.. 6 McDaniel.... 6 Steal attempts against ---------------------- 1. Swarthmore.. 91 2. Ursinus..... 73 3. Dickinson... 67 McDaniel.... 67 5. JHU......... 64 6. Washington.. 62 7. Muhlenberg.. 59 8. Haverford... 58 9. Gettysburg.. 56 10.F&M......... 42 Passed balls ------------ 1. JHU......... 19 2. Washington.. 16 Dickinson... 16 4. Gettysburg.. 15 Swarthmore.. 15 6. McDaniel.... 13 7. F&M......... 10 8. Muhlenberg.. 9 9. Ursinus..... 8 10.Haverford... 5 Catchers interference --------------------- 1. Dickinson... 2 2. Swarthmore.. 1 F&M......... 1 Gettysburg.. 1